Kindergarten Readiness and What's Next for KIDS

As part of the Illinois State Board of Education’s (ISBE) recently released Illinois Report Card, the state included the 2023-2024 Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) data.

Since the tool’s statewide implementation in 2017, KIDS data has been the state’s window into understanding kindergarten readiness among Illinois children in a developmentally appropriate way. While KIDS is not the only student outcomes data available at the local level, it is the one and only data we have at the state-level to understand readiness across districts. The data has been eye-opening and has both motivated and enabled district and statewide policymakers to make data-driven decisions that support systems and programs improving kindergarten readiness.

The data reveals that in the 2023-2024 school year, 31.6% of all students in Illinois demonstrated kindergarten readiness in all three developmental areas (social and emotional development, language and literacy development, and math), a slight improvement from the previous year. While it is good news that the state has shown some improvement in overall readiness, it is disturbing to know that gaps across lines of race, income, and specialized learning style not only begin before young learners enter kindergarten, but that these gaps remain stubbornly persistent. 

Percentage of Readiness in all Three Developmental Areas by Race/Ethnicity, 2017-2024

Percentage of Readiness in all Three Developmental Areas by Student Group, 2023-2024

Why KIDS Data Matters

Findings from a series of recent reports from the Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative (IWERC) on Kindergarten readiness are consistent with what the latest KIDS data reveals about disparities between student groups. White and Asian students were 15 to 25 percentage points more likely than Black and Latinx students to be kindergarten ready in all three domains. Students who were eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL), were English Learners (ELs), or had an Individualized Education Program (IEP) were 15 to 25 percentage points less likely to be kindergarten ready in each of the three domains. Report authors go on to answer a critical question in their secondary report: do disparities grow, shrink, or remain stable as students move through the educational system? The answer - kindergarten readiness predicts later academic achievement. Specifically, students who enter kindergarten with demonstrated readiness are more than twice as likely to be proficient in Math and English Arts in Grade 3. That relationship affirms the relevance of the tool, but here are a few things to consider.

Readiness on KIDS alone does not guarantee later academic success. Data indicates that Black, Latinx, and those students who receive free/reduced price lunch are less likely to score at or above proficiency in Grade 3. These trends are particularly troublesome, underscoring the need for targeted supports (e.g. technical assistance, increased resources) during the early and primary years, further consideration of the mixed-delivery system, and better understanding of individual family needs. 

In addition, while it is understandable that there is a relationship between kindergarten readiness and later academic proficiency, the truth is, our goal should be to disrupt that relationship. Put differently, when KIDS data lets us know that a student may be struggling, it creates an opportunity for us to provide the support necessary to catch the child up. If we are able to do that effectively, one would hope that later academic proficiency would consistently exceed kindergarten readiness levels. 

What is the State Doing to Support KIDS

Over the last few years, with support from the McCormick Foundation, the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) has hosted annual KIDS Summits. At the November 2024 KIDS Summit, over 200 teachers, districts, and school administrators convened to learn from experts and peers across the state about various applications of the tool’s data, guidelines of the tool’s implementation for special populations, and connections of KIDS to the Illinois Comprehensive Literacy Plan. This year’s main topic was meeting learning standards through play with other sessions ranging from using play for learning and assessment in special education settings to the role of play-based learning in the transition from PreK to K. The clear takeaway from the summit was that a play-based learning environment is essential to achieving KIDS' full potential in kindergarten classrooms and critical in understanding where children are developmentally in their learning journey. Beyond the tool’s implementation, there has been a false dichotomy between play and learning when in fact they are seamlessly intertwined, and play-based learning has proven to be critical to students’ learning and development.

How KIDS Can Improve

While we were excited to see ISBE prioritize play-based learning in this year’s summit, more can be done to not only improve the tool’s implementation, but also to support a statewide focus on closing outcome gaps between student groups for our youngest learners. The KIDS Advisory Committee has recommended that ISBE address these issues through increased community engagement with district leaders to better understand the tool’s current administration and application. The feedback can then be used to create materials that details how KIDS can assist districts in strengthening their K-2 instruction. Lastly, ISBE should consider increasing the number of measures that are required for KIDS. Evidence from current districts who administer the tool with increased measures suggest that if the KIDS tool is administered more than the required number of measures across multiple times in the school year, educators can make better use of the data to inform and advance developmentally appropriate instruction.

What’s Next?

Following the momentum of the successful KIDS summit, the recently released KIDS data, and the IWERC KIDS reports, we look to ISBE to provide strategies that put the state on the path to fulfill the goals and design of KIDS for all students, including those who are diverse learners and English Learners. With the state’s new Illinois Department of Early Childhood (IDEC) in its first planning year, it is a critical time to examine persistent gaps in kindergarten readiness and ask ourselves how we can do better to fulfill the needs of our youngest learners. IDEC, in partnership with ISBE and other stakeholders, has the unique opportunity to 1) use the data we already have to inform the development of stronger and more equitable systems that lead to closing readiness gaps and sufficiently preparing young children from birth to age 5 for kindergarten while also 2) practicing active continuous improvement of the current KIDS assessment and system to improve data reliability and validity.

Maya Portillo is the Senior Policy Advisor for Advance Illinois. Melissa Maldonado is a Policy Analyst for Start Early.

Early Childhood and Illinois’ New Single Agency

On May 9, 2024, the Illinois General Assembly passed the historic SB1, creating a single Department of Early Childhood by uniting early childhood services into one new agency. This is an important step in supporting Illinois children and their families with the programs and resources they need to thrive.  

Recently, Educator Advisory Council (EAC) members Cara Craig, a Home Visitor with Head Start/ECE Policy at the University of Wisconsin Whitewater/Childcare Network of Evanston, and Michelle Zurita-Sharpe a Pre-Kindergarten Special Education Teacher at Chicago Public Schools discussed their thoughts on the current system and their hopes for the new single agency that SB1 has established. 

How would you describe Illinois’ early childhood education and care system before the passage of SB1? How did that system impact your specific work and how have you seen it impact the children and families you serve? 

Cara: I have been working in Early Childhood Education (ECE) in Illinois for 25 years. I hope that SB1 brings some form of consistency of quality to programs. ECE has such a strong impact on children and their families, and it is not available for everyone. I recently came from teaching in a private school. We served exclusively affluent families, and these families can always find childcare. I now work for Head Start and the disjointedness of choices and availability is very hard to navigate. Having an umbrella for ECE will hopefully bring things together for families, teachers, centers and ultimately children. 

Michelle: Before the passage of SB1, the early childhood education and care system was divided with each agency working to provide similar services in silo. This division created dysfunction in the system for child care providers, families, and workforce members. As someone who went from working in a community-based child care center (CBO) to a public school setting, I experienced firsthand the lack of pay parity that exists for preschool teachers between different settings. I got paid significantly more working in a public-based child care center compared to the CBO despite the fact I followed the same curriculum, had a similar demographic of students, and worked in the same city (a 5-mile difference). In the public school setting, I also worked less hours, had better benefits, and more material support. Contrast to the public school setting, the CBO I worked at had staff that experienced greater financial hardship which contributed to a higher staff turnover rate. The turnover disrupted the educational experiences of children as they were then forced to divide between other classes or tough it out with substitutes that did not know them and their needs. Those of us who stayed were overworked amongst the staffing shortage and could not rely on help from the director, because the director too was overwhelmed navigating the multiple funding streams required to keep the center open and each of the different classrooms in compliance. 

What excites you about the move to a unified agency and why? What concerns you? 

Cara: I am excited about the positive movement towards the importance of ECE, respect for the people who do the hard work of ECE, the need to make it accessible for all. Not that it needs to be the same, but that families have access to what they need. I am concerned it will become a huge unconnected agency that doesn’t understand what is going on in the real world, losing funding, or taking funding from other important things. 

Michelle: I’m excited that the unified agency and Smart Start investments overall will go towards helping child care providers give their staff raises via the Smart Start Workforce Grants and Quality Improvement Grants.   

How will the move to a single agency impact young learners, their families, and providers/educators? How will it impact you? 

Cara: Hopefully it will bring about an understanding of resources and make them streamlined for families, less confusing and easier to access. 

Michelle: This excites me because it is a step in the right direction to retaining current workforce members and hopefully recruiting new ones. 

In your opinion, what will ensure that this is a smoother transition for all involved? Are there any key factors the state should take into consideration to improve and strengthen how the system has worked for providers, families and children? 

Cara: I think that they need to ensure that they have voices from teachers, and families. Being well-meaning is not enough.

Michelle: To ensure a smooth transition, the state needs to center family and educator voices. Providers and classroom-based staff who work directly with children need to be involved at every step of the process. They have the expertise necessary to make decisions that are not just good for children but best for them. 

How will the single agency help your early childhood community? 

Cara: Hopefully access to resources. 

Michelle: Once programs are unified under the Department of Early Childhood, I would like to see the child care deserts in my community be addressed. Where I live, in Worth, Illinois, there is not enough care available for the number of children under 6 living in the town. This requires families to travel farther away or rely on family members to care for their child while they go to work. The same can be said for surrounding neighborhoods such as Steger, Ford Heights, Justice, Hometown, Lemont, and Chicago Ridge.